New York Times (NYT) Reports Q3 Earnings: What Key Metrics Have to Say

For the quarter ended September 2024, New York Times Co. (NYT) reported revenue of $640.18 million, up 7% over the same period last year. EPS came in at $0.45, compared to $0.37 in the year-ago quarter.The reported revenue represents a surprise of -0.03% over the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $640.39 million. With the consensus EPS estimate being $0.42, the EPS surprise was +7.14%.While investors scrutinize revenue and earnings changes year-over-year and how they compare with Wall Street expectations to determine their next move, some key metrics always offer a more accurate picture of a company's financial health.Since these metrics play a crucial role in driving the top- and bottom-line numbers, comparing them with the year-ago numbers and what analysts estimated about them helps investors better project a stock's price performance.Here is how New York Times performed in the just reported quarter in terms of the metrics most widely monitored and projected by Wall Street analysts: Total Digital-only subscriptions: 10,470 versus the two-analyst average estimate of 10,520. Print subscriptions: 620 versus 618 estimated by two analysts on average. Digital-only Subscribers- Bundle and multiproduct: 5.12 million versus the two-analyst average estimate of 5.19 million. Digital-only Subscribers - News-only: 2.11 million versus 2.12 million estimated by two analysts on average. Total subscriptions Digital & Print: 11,090 compared to the 11,138 average estimate based on two analysts. Digital-only subscription revenues: $322.20 million versus $320.86 million estimated by two analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +14.2% change. Advertising Revenues- Total Digital: $81.56 million versus $80.87 million estimated by two analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +8.8% change. Advertising Revenues- Total Print: $36.81 million compared to the $37.59 million average estimate based on two analysts. The reported number represents a change of -12.6% year over year. Revenue- Other: $68.48 million versus the two-analyst average estimate of $68.91 million. The reported number represents a year-over-year change of +9.3%. Print subscription revenues: $131.13 million versus $132.17 million estimated by two analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a -3.8% change. Revenue- Advertising: $118.37 million versus $118.46 million estimated by two analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +1.1% change. Revenues- Subscription: $453.33 million versus $453.02 million estimated by two analysts on average. Compared to the year-ago quarter, this number represents a +8.3% change. View all Key Company Metrics for New York Times here>>>Shares of New York Times have returned +3% over the past month versus the Zacks S&P 500 composite's +0.4% change. The stock currently has a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), indicating that it could perform in line with the broader market in the near term.Research Chief Names "Single Best Pick to Double"From thousands of stocks, 5 Zacks experts each have chosen their favorite to skyrocket +100% or more in months to come. From those 5, Director of Research Sheraz Mian hand-picks one to have the most explosive upside of all.This company targets millennial and Gen Z audiences, generating nearly $1 billion in revenue last quarter alone. A recent pullback makes now an ideal time to jump aboard. Of course, all our elite picks aren’t winners but this one could far surpass earlier Zacks’ Stocks Set to Double like Nano-X Imaging which shot up +129.6% in little more than 9 months.Free: See Our Top Stock And 4 Runners UpWant the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report The New York Times Company (NYT): Free Stock Analysis ReportTo read this article on Zacks.com click here.Zacks Investment ResearchWeiter zum vollständigen Artikel bei Zacks Weiter zum vollständigen Artikel bei Zacks